27 sep. 2016

thoughts on mainstream psychiatry and mental illness

let me make it clear: mental illness is a fucking myth
and a euphemism for behaviors
condemned by the collective establishment
as malfunctional, dangerous and/or agitating;
only that which is observable through means of the scientific method
in the physiology and/or neurology of an individual
can rightfully be deduced, diagnosed, subject to treatment,
along the lines of that of bodily affliction and disease;
diseases are malfunctions of the human bodily system
of the liver; the heart; the skin; the kidneys; the spleen; the brain;
no mere behavior can in itself be considered a disease;
categorized are they in a highly scientific manner,
although the process of diagnosis roots in a subjective judgement
permeated with the interests of psychiatric authorities.



I maintain:
by calling people diseased, as they showcase behaviors that disturb;
patterns that unsettle; words that offend; actions that hurt;
the psychiatric establishment imposes and implements,
often above the head of the patient, a kind of hierarchical structure
wherein the patient is stripped of the sense of any moral responsibility,
being told that the prime mover of his or her behavioral patterns are
diseases, and as such, not legitimate; this is done, consciously or not,
in order to better control and subdue them.



Self-victimization is encouraged ---
the patient is but a piece of cloth in some kind of sickness hurricane;



the diagnosis of mental ilness,
unless measurable scientifically in the brain or in the body
will always be subjective and tainted by external factors;
the predispositions of the psychatrist as a professional;
his personal and highly unignorable opinion on the subject,
the rhetoric and conversational abilities of the patient, et cetera.



State-institutionalized psychatric establishments are cancerous
as entities, because the will and the interest of the state,
which is in relation to the people they govern,
implements standards of behavior; living; morality; value
onto the receiver of psychiatric treatment, conforming him or her
in accord with the needs and alignments of the standard;
drapetomania and hysteria are great examples of this.

Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar