T H E E N D C O M M U N E

Radicalization is but a dysphemism for uncompromising individuation; society can not tolerate uncompromising individuation because, by that point, destructivity has become outside of possible negotiation. That is why radicalization is treated as if a pest, even though it is an explosion of subjective potential. When society claims for its citizens the freedom of expression, it comes with a tremendous caveat: you are free to express your individuality, but only until it becomes dangerous for the other. That is why this piece of judicial nomenclature itself, freedom of expression, is an intellectually dishonest phraseology at best, and an outright fucking deceit at worst. It should be called: tolerance for certain mild expressions of your shallower personality. That is the true face of this freedom of expression, for freedom of expression, in its truest and most honorific emobodiment, would mean the same as radicalization.